<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad SEO Habits</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=bad-seo-habits</link>
	<description>Addicted to Web Analytics Since 2004</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 05:55:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mymo</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>mymo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymotech.com/?p=40#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Jason, 
Please see my post about this matter &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mymotech.com/?p=49&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,<br />
Please see my post about this matter <a href="http://www.mymotech.com/?p=49">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad SEO Tactics: Unethical or just Unwise?: Mymotech - Analytics, SEO, and stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad SEO Tactics: Unethical or just Unwise?: Mymotech - Analytics, SEO, and stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymotech.com/?p=40#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] When I wrote about Ditech using NOSCRIPT tags to put SEO&#8217;d content on their pages I used the word unethical a few times. In retrospect, unethical is probably not the best word for it. What a company decides to put on their webpages is not a matter of ethics unless it is breaking some law or something. Obviously, there is a little more water in that well, but I don&#8217;t want to get into it. Now, unwise or dumb may be a suitable moniker for what is happening on Ditech.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] When I wrote about Ditech using NOSCRIPT tags to put SEO&#8217;d content on their pages I used the word unethical a few times. In retrospect, unethical is probably not the best word for it. What a company decides to put on their webpages is not a matter of ethics unless it is breaking some law or something. Obviously, there is a little more water in that well, but I don&#8217;t want to get into it. Now, unwise or dumb may be a suitable moniker for what is happening on Ditech.com. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymotech.com/?p=40#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Please explain this comment, &quot;If nothing happens eventually the credibility of the organic results will erode.&quot;

While I&#039;m not for &quot;spam&quot; results in natural search please explain how this result, which is 100% relevant to the search term, in anyway hurts the user experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please explain this comment, &#8220;If nothing happens eventually the credibility of the organic results will erode.&#8221;</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m not for &#8220;spam&#8221; results in natural search please explain how this result, which is 100% relevant to the search term, in anyway hurts the user experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackhat SEO: Who Else is thinking about this?: Mymotech</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackhat SEO: Who Else is thinking about this?: Mymotech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 05:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymotech.com/?p=40#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] Turns out I am not the only one thinking about unethical SEO. On the same day as my post about Bad SEO habits, there were some other notable posts around the internet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Turns out I am not the only one thinking about unethical SEO. On the same day as my post about Bad SEO habits, there were some other notable posts around the internet. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymo</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>mymo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymotech.com/?p=40#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Ahh yes, but the technorati tags are at least visible without doing browser backflips. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh yes, but the technorati tags are at least visible without doing browser backflips. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mymotech.com/?p=40#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I see you managed to include &quot;SEO&quot; twice, &quot;Search Engine Optimization&quot; and &quot;Home Equity Loans&quot; in your technorati tags.  Very organic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you managed to include &#8220;SEO&#8221; twice, &#8220;Search Engine Optimization&#8221; and &#8220;Home Equity Loans&#8221; in your technorati tags.  Very organic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
