<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bad SEO Habits</title>
	<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/</link>
	<description>The web analytics blog of Michael Helbling</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 23:02:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mymo</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>mymo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:21:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-100</guid>
		<description>Jason, 
Please see my post about this matter &lt;a href="http://www.mymotech.com/?p=49"&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,<br />
Please see my post about this matter <a href="http://www.mymotech.com/?p=49">here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bad SEO Tactics: Unethical or just Unwise?: Mymotech - Analytics, SEO, and stuff</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Bad SEO Tactics: Unethical or just Unwise?: Mymotech - Analytics, SEO, and stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 23:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] When I wrote about Ditech using NOSCRIPT tags to put SEO&#8217;d content on their pages I used the word unethical a few times. In retrospect, unethical is probably not the best word for it. What a company decides to put on their webpages is not a matter of ethics unless it is breaking some law or something. Obviously, there is a little more water in that well, but I don&#8217;t want to get into it. Now, unwise or dumb may be a suitable moniker for what is happening on Ditech.com. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] When I wrote about Ditech using NOSCRIPT tags to put SEO&#8217;d content on their pages I used the word unethical a few times. In retrospect, unethical is probably not the best word for it. What a company decides to put on their webpages is not a matter of ethics unless it is breaking some law or something. Obviously, there is a little more water in that well, but I don&#8217;t want to get into it. Now, unwise or dumb may be a suitable moniker for what is happening on Ditech.com. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Please explain this comment, "If nothing happens eventually the credibility of the organic results will erode."

While I'm not for "spam" results in natural search please explain how this result, which is 100% relevant to the search term, in anyway hurts the user experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please explain this comment, &#8220;If nothing happens eventually the credibility of the organic results will erode.&#8221;</p>
<p>While I&#8217;m not for &#8220;spam&#8221; results in natural search please explain how this result, which is 100% relevant to the search term, in anyway hurts the user experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blackhat SEO: Who Else is thinking about this?: Mymotech</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-59</link>
		<dc:creator>Blackhat SEO: Who Else is thinking about this?: Mymotech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2006 05:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-59</guid>
		<description>[...] Turns out I am not the only one thinking about unethical SEO. On the same day as my post about Bad SEO habits, there were some other notable posts around the internet. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Turns out I am not the only one thinking about unethical SEO. On the same day as my post about Bad SEO habits, there were some other notable posts around the internet. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mymo</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>mymo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-58</guid>
		<description>Ahh yes, but the technorati tags are at least visible without doing browser backflips. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ahh yes, but the technorati tags are at least visible without doing browser backflips. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel</title>
		<link>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 02:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.mymotech.com/bad-seo-habits/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>I see you managed to include "SEO" twice, "Search Engine Optimization" and "Home Equity Loans" in your technorati tags.  Very organic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see you managed to include &#8220;SEO&#8221; twice, &#8220;Search Engine Optimization&#8221; and &#8220;Home Equity Loans&#8221; in your technorati tags.  Very organic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
